Monday, October 3, 2011

Refection 1


                 In USA, the earliest anthropological research on city life was after World War II, and a great interest and development in anthropology begin in the 1960s and 1970s. Earliest American research mostly dealt with American Indian tribes.  Franz Boas help standardizing this new approach of data collecting (field work). Most anthropologists believe in “fieldwork as a primary data-gathering strategy” (6).  They also believed in short term fieldtrip. British anthropologist named Malinowski believed in long-term field work and American anthropologists soon adopted his method.
              
                   In the 1950s, there was a boom in the anthropological department. As a result, most anthropologists have more resources and money to expand and facilitate their researches.  Tool that has been improve by technology over the years but still essential and primary are pencil and notebook (to keep / take notes), tape recorder and camera. After the big boom, anthropologists have move from pleasant and rural area to study urban dwellers.  Different method was used to study the urbanity in a holistic context. The heterogeneous population was dived into different category to understand and great a more vivid insight.  Many anthropologists lived with the subjects to for their fieldwork, however, most found a resourceful informant. Many have learned the native language or rely on a translator.   

                Ted Bestor shows us how difficult it is to do a field work in real life. He takes all the theories and methods and tries to implement it in his study. He talks about his journey as an anthropologist’s doing research in Tokyo, Japan.  The hardship he had faced and how he and his wife managed to prevail through it. Who and where he found his help, like the lady in the supermarket. He shows us how the method comes to life.

Refection 3


Security and transportation are things to consider while choosing to settle down or call a place home. Setha Low and Derek Pardue take disparate approach from each other’s in their anthropological field works. Low describe why people choose to live in a gated community; how crime and socioeconomic security plays a significant role in their decision.  In the other hand, Pardue discuss how we are all connected with the help of our public transportation system.  Even, if we live in ‘centers’ or ‘peripheries’ our vast transit connects our all.   

Low focus on two gated communities located in San Antonio and New York City. They both provide excellent comparative cases because of the differences between them in population size, crime, norm and etc.  Crime and personal and emotional security is the driven force in selecting to live in a gated community.  The people Low interviewed who don’t live in a gated community have one thing in common. They are all afraid of their neighborhood.  Living is some sort of constant fear.

I agree with almost all of Low research and I personally want to live in a gated community myself. I have grown up in the city my whole life and really haven’t had any serious problem. However, the fear is always there and the neighborhood is changing for the worst. One thing I do thing Low didn’t mention is that it isn’t easy to get into a gated community.

Furthermore, I don’t agree with Blakely and Snyder in ‘the phenomenon of wallet cities and gated communities is a dramatic manifestation of a new fortress mentality growing in America.’ I don’t think it is a new manifestation or a new concept. Moreover, I think gated communities are as old as urbanization. In the medieval time, kings lived in a castle or palace gated by high wall of stones and bricks, with 24/7 watch guard.